KS3M vs X4-QZ
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 3400 W | 340 W | |
| Release | 2023-10 | 2023-03 | |
| Best opportunity | |||
| Profit/day | $-5.50 | $0.33 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 63/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | KS3M | X4-QZ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etchash | not supported | 840 MH/s340 W · 2.471 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 840 MH/s380 W · 2.211 MH/s/W | |
| KHeavyHash | 6 TH/s3400 W · 1.765 GH/s/W | not supported |