DSM7T vs X4-QZ
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 2100 W | 340 W | |
| Release | 2018-08 | 2023-03 | |
| Best opportunity |  SCNetwork |  QKCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.44 | $0.42 | |
| Score | 46/100 | 64/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | DSM7T | X4-QZ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (14r) | 7 TH/s2100 W · 3.333 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake (2b) | 3.5 TH/s2100 W · 1.667 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | not supported | 840 MH/s340 W · 2.471 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 840 MH/s380 W · 2.211 MH/s/W |