DSM7T vs X16-Q
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 2100 W | 620 W | |
| Release | 2018-08 | 2023-05 | |
| Best opportunity |  SCPNetwork |  ETCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-3.91 | $0.08 | |
| Score | 33/100 | 67/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | DSM7T | X16-Q | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (14r) | 7 TH/s2100 W · 3.333 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake (2b) | 3.5 TH/s2100 W · 1.667 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | not supported | 1.95 GH/s620 W · 3.145 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 1.95 GH/s630 W · 3.095 MH/s/W |