DSM7T vs BK-G28
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 2100 W | 1300 W | |
| Release | 2018-08 | 2018-10 | |
| Best opportunity |  SCPNetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-3.91 | $-0.84 | |
| Score | 33/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | DSM7T | BK-G28 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (14r) | 7 TH/s2100 W · 3.333 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake (2b) | 3.5 TH/s2100 W · 1.667 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| Groestl | not supported | 28 GH/s450 W · 62.22 MH/s/W | |
| Myr-Groestl | not supported | 28 GH/s350 W · 80 MH/s/W | |
| NIST5 | not supported | 28 GH/s550 W · 50.91 MH/s/W | |
| Quark | not supported | 28 GH/s800 W · 35 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 28 GH/s850 W · 32.94 MH/s/W | |
| Skein | not supported | 14 GH/s300 W · 46.67 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | not supported | 3.5 GH/s450 W · 7.778 MH/s/W |