GTX 1650 vs SC1 Immersion
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Power | 50 W | 1600 W | |
| Release | 2019-03 | ||
| Best opportunity | |||
| Profit/day | $0.09 | $-0.32 | |
| Score | 65/100 | 42/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | GTX 1650 | SC1 Immersion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0x10 | 4.655 MH/s50 W · 93.11 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Allium | 3.871 MH/s50 W · 77.43 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Argon2d-dyn | 72.51 kH/s68 W · 1.066 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Argon2d250 | 312.6 kH/s49 W · 6.38 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Argon2d4096 | 13.01 kH/s50 W · 260.2 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Astralhash | 5.064 MH/s48 W · 105.5 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Autolykos2 | 29.33 MH/s53 W · 553.3 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| BCD | 10.81 MH |