MinerstatMinerstat

GTX 1650 Super vs Antminer T17+ (64Th)

Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.

TypeGPUASIC
Power73 W3200 W
Release2019-12
Best opportunitySATOXNetworkBTCNetwork
Profit/day$0.12$-3.35
Score65/10049/100
View details →View details →

Benchmarks by algorithm

Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.

AlgorithmGTX 1650 SuperAntminer T17+ (64Th)
0x106.75 MH/s71 W · 95.08 kH/s/Wnot supported
Allium4.69 MH/s85 W · 55.18 kH/s/Wnot supported
Argon2d-dyn98.09 kH/s95 W · 1.033 kH/s/Wnot supported
Argon2d250424.3 kH/s100 W · 4.243 kH/s/Wnot supported
Argon2d409619.13 kH/s56 W · 341.7 H/s/Wnot supported
Astralhash7.377 MH/s79 W · 93.38 kH/s/Wnot supported
Autolykos232.42 MH/s70 W · 463.2 kH/s/Wnot supported
BCD15.47 MH/s91 W · 170 kH/s/Wnot supported
BeamHashII11.49 H/s99 W · 0.116 H/s/Wnot supported
BeamHashIII7.12 H/s43 W · 0.1656 H/s/Wnot supported
Blake (14r)2.063 GH/s104 W · 19.84 MH/s/Wnot supported
Blake (2b)1.504 GH/s105 W · 14.33 MH/s/Wnot supported
Blake (2s-Kadena)646.2 MH/s108 W · 5.984 MH/s/Wnot supported
Blake (2s)2.931 GH/s100 W · 29.31 MH/s/Wnot supported
BMW512978.3 MH/s95 W · 10.3 MH/s/Wnot supported