X1 vs Imperium F2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 1110 W | 990 W | |
| Release | 2019-04 | ||
| Best opportunity | |||
| Profit/day | $0.03 | $-1.90 | |
| Score | 65/100 | 40/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | X1 | Imperium F2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 71 GH/s1050 W · 67.62 MH/s/W | |
| Etchash | 5.25 GH/s1900 W · 2.763 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 5.25 GH/s1900 W · 2.763 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Handshake | not supported | 6.1 GH/s990 W · 6.162 MH/s/W | |
| Lyra2REv2 | 12.96 GH/s1110 W · 11.68 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Tellor | not supported | 9 GH/s780 W · 11.54 MH/s/W |