A11 vs Imperium V2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 2300 W | 750 W | |
| Release | 2024-09 | ||
| Best opportunity |  ALPHNetwork |  CKBNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-4.38 | $-1.44 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | A11 | Imperium V2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 12 GH/s750 W · 16 MH/s/W | |
| Blake3 | 1.2 TH/s2300 W · 521.7 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Eaglesong | not supported | 23.4 GH/s750 W · 31.2 MH/s/W | |
| Etchash | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA-256 | 72 TH/s3400 W · 21.18 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA512256d | 3.2 TH/s2300 W · 1.391 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| Solidity-SHA3 | not supported | 30 GH/s1100 W · 27.27 MH/s/W | |
| vBlake2 | not supported | 18 GH/s750 W · 24 MH/s/W |