A11 vs Imperium R2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 2300 W | 1150 W | |
| Release | 2024-09 | ||
| Best opportunity |  BCHNetwork |  HNSNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-3.83 | $-2.21 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 40/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | A11 | Imperium R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 85 GH/s1150 W · 73.91 MH/s/W | |
| Blake3 | 1.2 TH/s2300 W · 521.7 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Handshake | not supported | 7.1 GH/s1150 W · 6.174 MH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | 72 TH/s3400 W · 21.18 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA512256d | 3.2 TH/s2300 W · 1.391 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| Tellor | not supported | 11.9 GH/s1020 W · 11.67 MH/s/W |