Zig M1 vs X4-QZ
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 200 W | 340 W | |
| Release | 2018-11 | 2023-03 | |
| Best opportunity |  MONANetwork |  QKCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $1.69 | $0.57 | |
| Score | 79/100 | 66/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Zig M1 | X4-QZ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etchash | not supported | 840 MH/s340 W · 2.471 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 840 MH/s380 W · 2.211 MH/s/W | |
| Groestl | 2.61 GH/s200 W · 13.05 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| LBRY | 1.54 GH/s11 W · 140 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Lyra2REv2 | 192 MH/s25 W · 7.68 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Myr-Groestl | 4.3 GH/s220 W · 19.55 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Pascal | 2.3 GH/s3 W · 766.7 MH/s/W | not supported |