Zig M1 vs BK-G28
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 200 W | 1300 W | |
| Release | 2018-11 | 2018-10 | |
| Best opportunity | |||
| Profit/day | $-0.03 | $-0.83 | |
| Score | 40/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Zig M1 | BK-G28 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Groestl | 2.61 GH/s200 W · 13.05 MH/s/W | 28 GH/s450 W · 62.22 MH/s/W | |
| LBRY | 1.54 GH/s11 W · 140 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Lyra2REv2 | 192 MH/s25 W · 7.68 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Myr-Groestl | 4.3 GH/s220 W · 19.55 MH/s/W | 28 GH/s350 W · 80 MH/s/W | |
| NIST5 | not supported | 28 GH/s550 W · 50.91 MH/s/W | |
| Pascal | 2.3 GH/s3 W · 766.7 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | not supported | 28 GH/s800 W · 35 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 28 GH/s850 W · 32.94 MH/s/W | |
| Skein | not supported | 14 GH/s300 W · 46.67 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | not supported | 3.5 GH/s450 W · 7.778 MH/s/W |