CMP 70HX vs Teraflux AI3680
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Power | 6840 W | ||
| Release | 2024-12 | ||
| Best opportunity |  ZANONetwork |  BTCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.07 | $1.99 | |
| Score | 59/100 | 71/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | CMP 70HX | Teraflux AI3680 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 | 166.5 MH/s140 W · 1.189 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| cuckARoo29 | 4.67 H/s147 W · 0.03177 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | 80.76 MH/s199 W · 405.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 80.76 MH/s199 W · 405.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| FishHash | 52.88 MH/s189 W · 279.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KarlsenHash | 52.88 MH/s189 W · 279.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 28.81 MH/s195 W · 147.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| NexaPoW | 55.78 MH/s141 W · 395.6 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| ProgPow | 28.85 MH/s199 W · 145 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| ProgPowZ | 28.85 MH/s199 W · 145 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 200 TH/s3200 W · 62.5 GH/s/W |