F2 vs X16-Q
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | FPGA | ASIC | |
| Power | 1202 W | 620 W | |
| Release | 2023-05 | ||
| Best opportunity |  DGBNetwork |  ETCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.32 | $0.37 | |
| Score | 28/100 | 71/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | F2 | X16-Q | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 67.61 GH/s682 W · 99.13 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | not supported | 1.95 GH/s620 W · 3.145 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 1.95 GH/s630 W · 3.095 MH/s/W | |
| KangarooTwelve | 65.88 GH/s912 W · 72.24 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Keccak256 | 290 kH/s911 W · 318.3 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Odocrypt | 6.6 GH/s1202 W · 5.491 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Tellor | 99.9 GH/s712 W · 140.3 MH/s/W | not supported |