Antminer T17 (40Th) vs SC1 Immersion
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 2200 W | 1600 W | |
| Release | 2019-05 | 2019-03 | |
| Best opportunity |  BCHNetwork |  SCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-2.75 | $-1.23 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 33/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Antminer T17 (40Th) | SC1 Immersion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2b-Sia) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2b) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | 40 TH/s2200 W · 18.18 GH/s/W | not supported |