Quadruple Mini Miner vs Imperium V2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 160 W | 750 W | |
| Release | 2016-08 | ||
| Best opportunity |  DASHNetwork |  CKBNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.30 | $-1.44 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Quadruple Mini Miner | Imperium V2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 12 GH/s750 W · 16 MH/s/W | |
| Eaglesong | not supported | 23.4 GH/s750 W · 31.2 MH/s/W | |
| Quark | 600 MH/s100 W · 6 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qubit | 600 MH/s112 W · 5.357 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Solidity-SHA3 | not supported | 30 GH/s1100 W · 27.27 MH/s/W | |
| vBlake2 | not supported | 18 GH/s750 W · 24 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | 600 MH/s160 W · 3.75 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X13 | 600 MH/s184 W · 3.261 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X17 | 600 MH/s188 W · 3.191 MH/s/W | not supported |