Quadruple Mini Miner vs Zig M1
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 160 W | 200 W | |
| Release | 2016-08 | 2018-11 | |
| Best opportunity |  DASHNetwork |  MONANetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.30 | $2.23 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 40/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Quadruple Mini Miner | Zig M1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Groestl | not supported | 2.61 GH/s200 W · 13.05 MH/s/W | |
| LBRY | not supported | 1.54 GH/s11 W · 140 MH/s/W | |
| Lyra2REv2 | not supported | 192 MH/s25 W · 7.68 MH/s/W | |
| Myr-Groestl | not supported | 4.3 GH/s220 W · 19.55 MH/s/W | |
| Pascal | not supported | 2.3 GH/s3 W · 766.7 MH/s/W | |
| Quark | 600 MH/s100 W · 6 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qubit | 600 MH/s112 W · 5.357 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | 600 MH/s160 W · 3.75 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X13 | 600 MH/s184 W · 3.261 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X17 | 600 MH/s188 W · 3.191 MH/s/W | not supported |