Mini Miner vs SC1 Immersion
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 40 W | 1600 W | |
| Release | 2016-09 | 2019-03 | |
| Best opportunity |  DASHNetwork |  SCPNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.08 | $-3.00 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 33/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Mini Miner | SC1 Immersion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2b-Sia) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2b) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| Quark | 150 MH/s25 W · 6 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qubit | 150 MH/s28 W · 5.357 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | 150 MH/s40 W · 3.75 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X13 | 150 MH/s46 W · 3.261 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X17 | 150 MH/s47 W · 3.191 MH/s/W | not supported |