Miner Cube vs SC1 Slim
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 75 W | 450 W | |
| Release | 2017-04 | 2019-01 | |
| Best opportunity |  DASHNetwork |  SCPNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.14 | $-0.84 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 33/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Miner Cube | SC1 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2b-Sia) | not supported | 550 GH/s450 W · 1.222 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2b) | not supported | 550 GH/s450 W · 1.222 GH/s/W | |
| Quark | 300 MH/s50 W · 6 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qubit | 300 MH/s55 W · 5.455 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | 300 MH/s75 W · 4 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X13 | 300 MH/s87 W · 3.448 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X17 | 300 MH/s89 W · 3.371 MH/s/W | not supported |