Giant A900 vs F2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | FPGA | |
| Power | 217 W | 1202 W | |
| Release | 2016-10 | ||
| Best opportunity | |||
| Profit/day | $-0.41 | $-0.60 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 38/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Giant A900 | F2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 67.61 GH/s682 W · 99.13 MH/s/W | |
| KangarooTwelve | not supported | 65.88 GH/s912 W · 72.24 MH/s/W | |
| Keccak256 | not supported | 290 kH/s911 W · 318.3 H/s/W | |
| Odocrypt | not supported | 6.6 GH/s1202 W · 5.491 MH/s/W | |
| Quark | 900 MH/s132 W · 6.818 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qubit | 900 MH/s146 W · 6.164 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Tellor | not supported | 99.9 GH/s712 W · 140.3 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | 900 MH/s217 W · 4.147 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X13 | 900 MH/s255 W · 3.529 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X14 | 900 MH/s263 W · 3.422 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X15 | 900 MH/s270 W · 3.333 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X17 | 900 MH/s263 W · 3.422 MH/s/W | not supported |