Giant+ A2000 vs A9 ZMaster
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 430 W | 620 W | |
| Release | 2017-08 | 2018-06 | |
| Best opportunity |  DASHNetwork |  ZECNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.81 | $1.85 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 80/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Giant+ A2000 | A9 ZMaster | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equihash | not supported | 50 kH/s620 W · 80.65 H/s/W | |
| Quark | 2 GH/s248 W · 8.065 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qubit | 2 GH/s280 W · 7.143 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | 2 GH/s430 W · 4.651 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X13 | 1.6 GH/s430 W · 3.721 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X14 | 1.6 GH/s450 W · 3.556 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X15 | 2 GH/s450 W · 4.444 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X17 | 1.6 GH/s440 W · 3.636 MH/s/W | not supported |