G28 vs X16-P
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 1300 W | 1900 W | |
| Release | 2023-08 | ||
| Best opportunity |  DASHNetwork |  ETCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-2.28 | $0.24 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 67/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | G28 | X16-P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etchash | not supported | 5.8 GH/s1900 W · 3.053 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 5.8 GH/s1900 W · 3.053 MH/s/W | |
| Groestl | 28 GH/s450 W · 62.22 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Myr-Groestl | 28 GH/s350 W · 80 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| NIST5 | 28 GH/s550 W · 50.91 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | 28 GH/s800 W · 35 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qubit | 28 GH/s850 W · 32.94 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Skein | 14 GH/s300 W · 46.67 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | 28 GH/s1300 W · 21.54 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11Gost | 3.5 GH/s450 W · 7.778 MH/s/W | not supported |