G28 vs A9++ ZMaster
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 1300 W | 1550 W | |
| Release | 2019-05 | ||
| Best opportunity |  DASHNetwork |  ZECNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-2.30 | $4.96 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 80/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | G28 | A9++ ZMaster | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equihash | not supported | 140 kH/s1550 W · 90.32 H/s/W | |
| Groestl | 28 GH/s450 W · 62.22 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Myr-Groestl | 28 GH/s350 W · 80 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| NIST5 | 28 GH/s550 W · 50.91 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | 28 GH/s800 W · 35 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qubit | 28 GH/s850 W · 32.94 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Skein | 14 GH/s300 W · 46.67 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | 28 GH/s1300 W · 21.54 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11Gost | 3.5 GH/s450 W · 7.778 MH/s/W | not supported |