BK-X vs Imperium F2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 630 W | 990 W | |
| Release | 2017-11 | ||
| Best opportunity |  DASHNetwork |  HNSNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.37 | $-1.90 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 40/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | BK-X | Imperium F2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 71 GH/s1050 W · 67.62 MH/s/W | |
| Groestl | 10 GH/s210 W · 47.62 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Handshake | not supported | 6.1 GH/s990 W · 6.162 MH/s/W | |
| Myr-Groestl | 10 GH/s150 W · 66.67 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| NIST5 | 10 GH/s250 W · 40 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | 10 GH/s360 W · 27.78 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qubit | 10 GH/s390 W · 25.64 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Skein | 5 GH/s120 W · 41.67 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Tellor | not supported | 9 GH/s780 W · 11.54 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | 1.35 GH/s200 W · 6.75 MH/s/W | not supported |