BK-X vs Phoenix
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 630 W | 3000 W | |
| Release | 2017-11 | ||
| Best opportunity |  DASHNetwork | ∞Multi NiceHash | |
| Profit/day | $-0.37 | $-0.58 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 40/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | BK-X | Phoenix | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethash | not supported | 2.6 GH/s3000 W · 866.7 kH/s/W | |
| Groestl | 10 GH/s210 W · 47.62 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Myr-Groestl | 10 GH/s150 W · 66.67 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| NIST5 | 10 GH/s250 W · 40 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | 10 GH/s360 W · 27.78 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qubit | 10 GH/s390 W · 25.64 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Skein | 5 GH/s120 W · 41.67 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | 1.35 GH/s200 W · 6.75 MH/s/W | not supported |