BK-G28 vs RX0
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 1300 W | 100 W | |
| Release | 2018-10 | 2024-09 | |
| Best opportunity |  DASHNetwork |  RXDNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.84 | $-0.07 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 34/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | BK-G28 | RX0 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Groestl | 28 GH/s450 W · 62.22 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Myr-Groestl | 28 GH/s350 W · 80 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| NIST5 | 28 GH/s550 W · 50.91 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | 28 GH/s800 W · 35 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qubit | 28 GH/s850 W · 32.94 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA512256d | not supported | 260 GH/s100 W · 2.6 GH/s/W | |
| Skein | 14 GH/s300 W · 46.67 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | 3.5 GH/s450 W · 7.778 MH/s/W | not supported |