BK-D vs SC1 Immersion
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 500 W | 1600 W | |
| Release | 2018-06 | 2019-03 | |
| Best opportunity |  SCNetwork | ||
| Profit/day | $-1.02 | ||
| Score | 36/100 | ||
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | BK-D | SC1 Immersion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (14r) | 280 GH/s550 W · 509.1 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake (2b-Sia) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2b) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| LBRY | 80 GH/s500 W · 160 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Pascal | 70 GH/s550 W · 127.3 MH/s/W | not supported |