BK-D vs X4-QZ
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 500 W | 340 W | |
| Release | 2018-06 | 2023-03 | |
| Best opportunity |  LBCNetwork |  ETCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.63 | $-0.0073 | |
| Score | 22/100 | 65/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | BK-D | X4-QZ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (14r) | 280 GH/s550 W · 509.1 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | not supported | 840 MH/s340 W · 2.471 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 840 MH/s380 W · 2.211 MH/s/W | |
| LBRY | 80 GH/s500 W · 160 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Pascal | 70 GH/s550 W · 127.3 MH/s/W | not supported |