BK-D vs A11
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 500 W | 2300 W | |
| Release | 2018-06 | 2024-09 | |
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork | ||
| Profit/day | $-3.82 | ||
| Score | 49/100 | ||
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | BK-D | A11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (14r) | 280 GH/s550 W · 509.1 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake3 | not supported | 1.2 TH/s2300 W · 521.7 MH/s/W | |
| Etchash | not supported | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | |
| LBRY | 80 GH/s500 W · 160 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Pascal | 70 GH/s550 W · 127.3 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 72 TH/s3400 W · 21.18 GH/s/W | |
| SHA512256d | not supported | 3.2 TH/s2300 W · 1.391 GH/s/W |