BK-B vs X16-Q
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 410 W | 620 W | |
| Release | 2018-01 | 2023-05 | |
| Best opportunity |  SCPNetwork |  ETCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.57 | $0.20 | |
| Score | 33/100 | 68/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | BK-B | X16-Q | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (14r) | 160 GH/s260 W · 615.4 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake (2b) | 80 GH/s300 W · 266.7 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | not supported | 1.95 GH/s620 W · 3.145 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 1.95 GH/s630 W · 3.095 MH/s/W | |
| LBRY | 40 GH/s400 W · 100 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Pascal | 40 GH/s210 W · 190.5 MH/s/W | not supported |