BK-B vs A11
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 410 W | 2300 W | |
| Release | 2018-01 | 2024-09 | |
| Best opportunity |  SCPNetwork |  BTCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.57 | $-3.51 | |
| Score | 33/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | BK-B | A11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (14r) | 160 GH/s260 W · 615.4 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake (2b) | 80 GH/s300 W · 266.7 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake3 | not supported | 1.2 TH/s2300 W · 521.7 MH/s/W | |
| Etchash | not supported | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | |
| LBRY | 40 GH/s400 W · 100 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Pascal | 40 GH/s210 W · 190.5 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 72 TH/s3400 W · 21.18 GH/s/W | |
| SHA512256d | not supported | 3.2 TH/s2300 W · 1.391 GH/s/W |