S9k vs SC1 Immersion
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 1148 W | 1600 W | |
| Release | 2019-08 | 2019-03 | |
| Best opportunity |  BCHNetwork |  SCPNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.69 | $-2.99 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 33/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | S9k | SC1 Immersion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2b-Sia) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2b) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | 13.5 TH/s1148 W · 11.76 GH/s/W | not supported |