E3 vs C1
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 760 W | 1200 W | |
| Release | 2018-07 | 2020-02 | |
| Best opportunity |  QKCNetwork |  CKBNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.21 | $-2.22 | |
| Score | 39/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | E3 | C1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eaglesong | not supported | 1.6 TH/s1200 W · 1.333 GH/s/W | |
| Ethash | 190 MH/s760 W · 250 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA3x | 14.88 GH/s620 W · 24 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA512256d | 11 GH/s600 W · 18.33 MH/s/W | not supported |