E3 vs SC1 Slim
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 760 W | 450 W | |
| Release | 2018-07 | 2019-01 | |
| Best opportunity |  QKCNetwork |  SCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.17 | $-0.18 | |
| Score | 39/100 | 40/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | E3 | SC1 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2b-Sia) | not supported | 550 GH/s450 W · 1.222 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2b) | not supported | 550 GH/s450 W · 1.222 GH/s/W | |
| Ethash | 190 MH/s760 W · 250 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA3x | 14.88 GH/s620 W · 24 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA512256d | 11 GH/s600 W · 18.33 MH/s/W | not supported |