E3 vs Imperium V2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 760 W | 750 W | |
| Release | 2018-07 | ||
| Best opportunity |  QKCNetwork |  CKBNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.23 | $-1.44 | |
| Score | 39/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | E3 | Imperium V2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 12 GH/s750 W · 16 MH/s/W | |
| Eaglesong | not supported | 23.4 GH/s750 W · 31.2 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | 190 MH/s760 W · 250 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA3x | 14.88 GH/s620 W · 24 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA512256d | 11 GH/s600 W · 18.33 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Solidity-SHA3 | not supported | 30 GH/s1100 W · 27.27 MH/s/W | |
| vBlake2 | not supported | 18 GH/s750 W · 24 MH/s/W |