E3 vs Imperium R2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 760 W | 1150 W | |
| Release | 2018-07 | ||
| Best opportunity |  QKCNetwork |  HNSNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.20 | $-2.21 | |
| Score | 39/100 | 40/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | E3 | Imperium R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 85 GH/s1150 W · 73.91 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | 190 MH/s760 W · 250 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Handshake | not supported | 7.1 GH/s1150 W · 6.174 MH/s/W | |
| SHA3x | 14.88 GH/s620 W · 24 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA512256d | 11 GH/s600 W · 18.33 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Tellor | not supported | 11.9 GH/s1020 W · 11.67 MH/s/W |