E3 vs Miner Cube
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 760 W | 75 W | |
| Release | 2018-07 | 2017-04 | |
| Best opportunity |  QKCNetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.17 | $-0.14 | |
| Score | 39/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | E3 | Miner Cube | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethash | 190 MH/s760 W · 250 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | not supported | 300 MH/s50 W · 6 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 300 MH/s55 W · 5.455 MH/s/W | |
| SHA3x | 14.88 GH/s620 W · 24 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA512256d | 11 GH/s600 W · 18.33 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | not supported | 300 MH/s75 W · 4 MH/s/W | |
| X13 | not supported | 300 MH/s87 W · 3.448 MH/s/W | |
| X17 | not supported | 300 MH/s89 W · 3.371 MH/s/W |