CMP 170HX vs RTX 5050
나란히 보는 채굴 비교: 사양, 알고리즘별 벤치마크, 효율, 현재 수익성.
ZANO알고리즘별 벤치마크
기기별 최고 벤치마크. 효율 = 와트당 해시레이트.
| 알고리즘 | CMP 170HX | RTX 5050 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | 160.2 MH/s191 W · 838.6 kH/s/W | 미지원 | |
| Autolykos2 | 364.8 MH/s167 W · 2.184 MH/s/W | 78.94 MH/s76 W · 1.039 MH/s/W | |
| cuckARoo29 | 11.33 H/s135 W · 0.08393 H/s/W | 4 H/s72 W · 0.05556 H/s/W | |
| cuckAToo32 | 미지원 | 0.2 H/s75 W · 0.002667 H/s/W | |
| Etchash | 139.1 MH/s169 W · 823.1 kH/s/W | 미지원 | |
| Ethash | 139.1 MH/s169 W · 823.1 kH/s/W | 미지원 | |
| EvrProgPow | 37.72 MH/s151 W · 249.8 kH/s/W | 미지원 | |
| FishHash | 108.4 MH/s198 W · 547.3 kH/s/W | 미지원 | |
| KarlsenHash | 108.4 MH/s198 W · 547.3 kH/s/W | 미지원 | |
| KAWPOW | 51.02 MH/s185 W · 275.8 kH/s/W | 20.38 MH/s112 W · 182 kH/s/W | |
| NexaPoW | 91.74 MH/s140 W · 655.3 kH/s/W | 50.33 MH/s101 W · 498.3 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | 63.87 MH/s221 W · 289 kH/s/W | 20.56 MH/s110 W · 186.9 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPowZ | 63.87 MH/s221 W · 289 kH/s/W | 20.56 MH/s110 W · 186.9 kH/s/W | |
| Qhash | 676 MH/s80 W · 8.45 MH/s/W | 692 MH/s38 W · 18.21 MH/s/W | |
| SHA3x | 447 MH/s95 W · 4.705 MH/s/W | 미지원 | |
| XelisHash | 30.11 kH/s134 W · 224.7 H/s/W | 4.52 kH/s61 W · 74.1 H/s/W |