RX 9070 vs CMP 90HX
Comparație de minerit față în față: specificații, benchmark-uri per algoritm, eficiență și profitabilitate curentă.
| Tip | GPU | GPU | |
| Putere | 216 W | 221 W | |
| Lansare | |||
| Cea mai bună oportunitate |  ZANONetwork |  FIRONetwork | |
| Profit/zi | $0.02 | $0.20 | |
| Scor | 64/100 | 72/100 | |
| Vezi detaliile → | Vezi detaliile → |
Benchmark-uri pe algoritm
Cel mai bun benchmark disponibil per dispozitiv; eficiență = hashrate per watt.
| Algoritm | RX 9070 | CMP 90HX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 | 78.8 MH/s144 W · 547.2 kH/s/W | 196.5 MH/s146 W · 1.346 MH/s/W | |
| cuckARoo29 | 14.2 H/s230 W · 0.06174 H/s/W | 6.33 H/s155 W · 0.04084 H/s/W | |
| cuckAToo32 | 1.3 H/s213 W · 0.006103 H/s/W | 0.55 H/s147 W · 0.003741 H/s/W | |
| CuckooCycle | nesuportat | 10.27 H/s237 W · 0.04333 H/s/W | |
| Etchash | nesuportat | 100.2 MH/s249 W · 402.2 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | nesuportat | 100.2 MH/s249 W · 402.2 kH/s/W | |
| EvrProgPow | nesuportat | 44.66 MH/s249 W · 179.4 kH/s/W | |
| FiroPoW | nesuportat | 45.36 MH/s249 W · 182.2 kH/s/W | |
| FishHash | 27.05 MH/s182 W · 148.6 kH/s/W | 65.75 MH/s206 W · 319.2 kH/s/W | |
| KarlsenHash | 27.05 MH/s182 W · 148.6 kH/s/W | 65.75 MH/s206 W · 319.2 kH/s/W | |
| KAWPOW | 41.03 MH/s318 W · 129 kH/s/W | 45.56 MH/s249 W · 183 kH/s/W | |
| MeowPow | 40.97 MH/s290 W · 141.3 kH/s/W | nesuportat | |
| NexaPoW | 94.61 MH/s254 W · 372.5 kH/s/W | 78.37 MH/s170 W · 461 kH/s/W | |
| Octopus | 80.95 MH/s219 W · 369.6 kH/s/W | 54.77 MH/s191 W · 286.8 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | 41.14 MH/s314 W · 131 kH/s/W | 25.66 MH/s179 W · 143.4 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPowZ | 41.14 MH/s314 W · 131 kH/s/W | 25.66 MH/s179 W · 143.4 kH/s/W | |
| Qhash | 2.58 GH/s239 W · 10.79 MH/s/W | 1.1 GH/s126 W · 8.73 MH/s/W | |
| SHA3x | 701 MH/s192 W · 3.651 MH/s/W | 388 MH/s139 W · 2.791 MH/s/W | |
| Verthash | nesuportat | 1.58 MH/s150 W · 10.53 kH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | nesuportat | 12.09 kH/s130 W · 93 H/s/W |