RTX 3050 vs Teraflux AH3880
Comparaison de minage côte à côte : specs, benchmarks par algorithme, efficacité et rentabilité actuelle.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Consommation | 104 W | 10740 W | |
| Sortie | 2025-03 | ||
| Meilleure opportunité |  SATOXNetwork |  BTCNetwork | |
| Profit/jour | $0.05 | $5.20 | |
| Score | 59/100 | 73/100 | |
| Voir les détails → | Voir les détails → |
Benchmarks par algorithme
Meilleur benchmark disponible par machine ; efficacité = hashrate par watt.
| Algorithme | RTX 3050 | Teraflux AH3880 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | 29.74 MH/s85 W · 349.9 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Argon2d4096 | 24.94 kH/s123 W · 202.8 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| Astralhash | 11.57 MH/s75 W · 154.2 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Autolykos2 | 76.49 MH/s67 W · 1.142 MH/s/W | non supporté | |
| BCD | 8.141 MH/s104 W · 78.28 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| BeamHashIII | 15.28 H/s113 W · 0.1352 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| Blake (2s) | 3.244 GH/s102 W · 31.81 MH/s/W | non supporté | |
| C11 | 11.03 MH/s79 W · 139.7 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| CNReverseWaltz | 1.061 kH/s96 W · 11.06 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| cuckARoo29 | 2.67 H/s69 W · 0.0387 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| cuckARood29 | 1.124 H/s95 W · 0.01183 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| cuckAToo32 | 0.33 H/s104 W · 0.003173 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| CuckooCycle | 4.088 H/s93 W · 0.04396 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| Curvehash | 1.701 MH/s79 W · 21.53 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Equihash(125,4) | 20.73 H/s118 W · 0.1757 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| Equihash(144,5) | 36 H/s130 W · 0.2769 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| Equihash(192,7) | 17.46 H/s108 W · 0.1617 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| Equihash(210,9) | 180 H/s121 W · 1.488 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| Equihash+Scrypt | 21.13 kH/s130 W · 162.5 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| Etchash | 29.69 MH/s70 W · 424.1 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Ethash | 29.69 MH/s85 W · 349.3 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| EvrProgPow | 14.73 MH/s102 W · 144.4 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| FiroPoW | 12.75 MH/s129 W · 98.85 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| FishHash | 19.16 MH/s75 W · 255.5 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| GhostRider | 625 H/s43 W · 14.53 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| HeavyHash | 208 MH/s69 W · 3.015 MH/s/W | non supporté | |
| HMQ1725 | 4.664 MH/s115 W · 40.56 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| KarlsenHash | 19.16 MH/s75 W · 255.5 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| KAWPOW | 14.9 MH/s101 W · 147.5 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Keccak | 604.4 MH/s108 W · 5.597 MH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Keccak-C | 601.3 MH/s109 W · 5.517 MH/s/W | non supporté | |
| KHeavyHash | 265.1 MH/s115 W · 2.305 MH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Lyra2REv2 | 41.26 MH/s126 W · 327.5 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Lyra2REv3 | 39.65 MH/s132 W · 300.4 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Lyra2z | 2.508 MH/s75 W · 33.44 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| NeoScrypt | 858.1 kH/s128 W · 6.704 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| NexaPoW | 33.45 MH/s67 W · 499.3 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| NIST5 | 20.26 MH/s130 W · 155.9 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Octopus | 23.89 MH/s132 W · 181 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| PHI1612 | 11.42 MH/s89 W · 128.3 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| ProgPow | 14.82 MH/s105 W · 141.1 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| ProgPowSERO | 13.11 MH/s132 W · 99.33 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| ProgPowZ | 14.82 MH/s105 W · 141.1 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Qhash | 501 MH/s42 W · 11.93 MH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Radiant | 375.8 kH/s114 W · 3.297 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| SHA-256 | non supporté | 400 TH/s5920 W · 67.57 GH/s/W | |
| SHA256DT | 974 MH/s122 W · 7.984 MH/s/W | non supporté | |
| SHA3x | 162 MH/s52 W · 3.115 MH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Skein2 | 60.76 GH/s124 W · 490 MH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Ubqhash | 26.2 MH/s115 W · 227.8 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| VerusHash | 5.145 MH/s100 W · 51.45 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| X15 | 7.994 MH/s117 W · 68.32 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| X16R | 10.34 MH/s107 W · 96.62 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| X16RT | 7.634 MH/s109 W · 70.04 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| X16Rv2 | 7.153 MH/s108 W · 66.23 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| X21S | 5.27 MH/s102 W · 51.67 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| X25X | 962.2 kH/s69 W · 13.95 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| XelisHash | 4.47 kH/s53 W · 84.34 H/s/W | non supporté | |
| Xevan | 4.022 MH/s129 W · 31.18 kH/s/W | non supporté | |
| Zhash | 30.28 H/s113 W · 0.268 H/s/W | non supporté |